
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Mongo the Destroyer |
|||
|
Well, Korea finally got the movie, and HOLY SHIT IS IT GOOD IN THE THEATERS. I had already downloaded it, but its waaaaaay better in the theaters (since you
can actually tell what the hell is going on). Damn that's a good movie.
|
|||
NoMercyMaster2001 |
|||
|
Yep there's a reason this movie is STILL #1 all-time on IMDB and more importantly is about to end up second to only the Titanic (which in itself is BS due
to ticket price inflation over time) on the all-time Box Office chart though, it's because it's literally THAT damn good and no matter how many times
you see it you just can't get enough. I only hope they're able to produce a part three that's as chilling and unpredictable as the second was, and
in order to do they'll obviously need perfect casting for the role of Riddler IF infact the rumors floating around are true for him being the next main
villian. I gotta believe there's no one more suitable for the job than Johnny Depp even though I'm sure others may have entirely different opinions on
the matter. But whoever it is they HAVE to be able to at the very least come close to what Heath was as Joker if this trilogy is to reach it's full
potential one way or another. Matching, or topping him though? Never happen.
Last Edited By: NoMercyMaster2001
08/09/08 01:17 PM.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
Mongo the Destroyer |
|||
|
I dunno, Johnny Depp seems too obvious, this director likes to get people you wouldn't expect. But man, the Riddler would rock the shit out of the next movie. |
|||
Rhyno247 |
|||
|
The Riddler would make the most sense since Nolan's Batman movies have been seated pretty well in reality. Everything he's done so far has been stuff
you could actually believe to happen in real life. I can't see him using vilians like Clayface or Man-Bat, as cool as they may look. Plus they could get a
lot of good internet viral marketing out of a Riddler character if they go with him in the third movie. I already can't wait. But I do need to see this
movie again.
|
|||
LaserJet Supreme |
|||
NoMercyMaster2001 wrote: Yea that's the problem with ranking them by takings. What's wrong with 'number of buys' like everything else uses? This way it's like
the publishers are bragging about how much they were able to charge.
|
|||
NoMercyMaster2001 |
|||
Yea that's the problem with ranking them by takings. What's wrong with 'number of buys' like everything else uses? This way it's like the publishers are bragging about how much they were able to charge.Can't say I disagree there by any means, it'd be VERY interesting to see how movies like these two and others stacked up against each other all-time just purely based on the number of buys like you say, verrrry interesting indeed given the completely different time periods of each release. And on a similar note it seems that with prices adjusted for inflation over time the #1 movie wouldn't even be Titanic OR Dark Knight either, it's actually Gone With The Wind and it's not even remotely close compared to those two movies, over a billion dollars worth of tickets sold for that one back in 1939 which is just absurd to even think about really, and meanwhile Titanic/DK currently rank 6/49 respectively. But to get back on point I do think DK still has a reasonable shot at surpassing Titanic for the regular record though, it'll for sure have to try and hang on in theaters as long as possible but with the 1 to 2 million it's STILL somehow raking in even on weekdays it's realistic to think this could actually happen before its run ends one way or another. At least if nothing else it's already guaranteed to lock up second place once it tops Star Wars in the next week or so, but Titanic will be an uphill battle to say the least with DK sitting on 441 mill at the moment and the other at 600.
Last Edited By: NoMercyMaster2001
08/12/08 10:51 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||